Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(6): e2318025, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20231694

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study assesses factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection rates at the 122nd Annual Congress of the German Society of Ophthalmology in 2022, which was held in-person for the first time in 3 years, during the Omicron wave.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 16: 1795-1805, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1887050

ABSTRACT

Background/Aims: To determine the impact of COVID-19 on the number of in- and outpatients surgical and diagnostic procedures performed at a southwestern German university hospital with corneal subspecialization. Methods: A retrospective examination of the number of inpatients, several outpatients subunits, in- and outpatient surgeries as well as diagnostic procedures at the Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Centre during the COVID-19 pandemic "lockdown period" from 18 March until 8 May 2020 in comparison with the corresponding period in 2019 (source: SAP database and electronic patient record FIDUS). Results: The year 2020 showed a significant decrease in the number of inpatient surgeries with a total number of 285 vs 412 in 2019. However, the number of corneal transplantations increased significantly (60 in 2020 vs 54 in 2019, p=0.0089). In the various outpatient units of our department, we observed a significant decrease in the number of consultations (1.711 in 2020 vs 3.194 in 2019), especially for cataract surgery consultations (34 vs 137, p<0.0001). The number of outpatient surgeries was significantly reduced in 2020, especially for cataract surgery (64 vs 216, p=0.007) and intravitreal injections (577 vs 768, p<0.0001). Conclusion: Despite taking all the necessary precautions to ensure that our medical care can continue to be available reliably and completely safe during the "Corona lockdown period", the number of in- and outpatient surgeries and the number of outpatient consultations decreased significantly. However, the number of corneal transplantations still increased.

3.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep ; 26: 101430, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1693990

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Increased risk of thromboembolic events has been associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections and more recently, with COVID-19 vaccination. To date, however, there are no reports of an association between the COVID-19 vaccination and retinal artery occlusions. We report a case of a patient who developed central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) 2 days following the administration of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 76-year-old woman presented to our Department of Ophthalmology complaining of painless vision loss in her left eye 48 hours after she had received her first dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Her best-corrected visual acuity was only hand movement in the left eye. Left eye ophthalmologic examination showed the presence of arterial narrowing and a cherry red spot. Optical coherence tomography showed severe macular swelling of the inner retinal layers in the left eye Fluorescein angiography performed the following day confirmed the diagnosis. The cardiovascular examination including Holter ECG was unremarkable. Complete blood count was within normal limits, without thrombocytopenia. A subsequent cerebral CT and CT-angiography scans did not show any other acute vascular event. Doppler angiography of the carotid artery was performed and showed normal flow without clinically significant plaques, stenoses, occlusions or dissections. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first case of an isolated CRAO following the administration of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Further studies are needed to evaluate this potential association and identify pathophysiologic relationships between COVID-19 vaccinations and CRAO.

4.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 15: 2051-2052, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1273299
5.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 238(6): 715-720, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1139766

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency inpatient volume in a tertiary eye care center in Germany with corneal main subspecialization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of ocular emergency patients who attended the inpatient unit of the Department of Ophthalmology of Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic, between 1 March and 30 April 2020, in comparison to the same time period in 2019. For each subject, clinical history and surgical reports were reviewed. After 24 March 2020, PCR examinations for SARS-CoV-2 were performed from throat swab specimens in all patients using real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: Totally, 135 patients were admitted in 2019 and 115 patients in 2020 as emergency cases. The patient age at the time of admission did not differ significantly between the two time periods (63.6 ± 17.9 years vs. 62.5 ± 19.6 years) (p = 0.792), but the average length of hospital stays increased significantly for 2020 (4.0 ± 3.6 vs. 4.4 ± 2.7 days, p = 0.043). The percentage of admissions due to acute corneal hydrops (0% vs. 3.5%) increased significantly from 2019 to 2020 (χ2 = 4.772, p = 0.028), however, there was not a significant difference between the two years for any other diagnosis (χ2 ≤ 3.564, p ≥ 0.059). From 2019 to 2020, the percentage of acute intravitreal anti-VEGF injections decreased significantly (7.9% vs. 1.3%, χ2 = 3.985, p = 0.045), but the proportion of other emergency surgeries did not differ between the two years (χ2 ≤ 3.617, p ≥ 0.057). COVID-19 PCR examination was performed in 66 (57.4%) cases in 2020 and all samples (100%) were negative. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID pandemic did not change emergency inpatient volume in our department, but duration of hospital stay was extended on average by 8 hours, mainly due to additional COVID-19-PCR examinations. The proportion of the most frequently performed surgeries did not change remarkably between 2019 and 2020, but with the introduction of Muraine's sutures in 2019, the percentage of admissions with acute corneal hydrops (with or without subsequent surgery) increased for 2020. No urgent surgery had to be postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic at our department; all operations were performed successfully.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Inpatients , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Curr Eye Res ; 46(5): 666-671, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-814019

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic there has been some debate regarding the risk of transmission through tissue transplantation and tissue banking processes. AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyze the changes that SARS-CoV-2 has caused regarding the harvesting of corneal donor tissue and eye bank activities in Germany. METHODS: A questionnaire was provided to 26 eye banks in Germany, consisting of questions about adaptations made in the screening of potential donors and the harvesting of corneal tissue following the pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Eighteen eye banks actively reduced recruitment of donors and two banks ceased all activity. Additional diagnostic screening was performed in eight banks, using conjunctival swabs and/or nasopharyngeal swabs. In six eye banks, additional protective measures, such as FFP2 masks and/or facial shields, were implemented. Overall, a mean reduction in the number of obtained donor tissues of 17% was observed. DISCUSSION: Conjunctival and/or nasopharyngeal swabs of donors have been implemented by a minority. Reasons for not performing additional tests may be moderate sensitivity and lack of validation for postmortem use of RT-PCR testing. Also, the hazard of SARS-CoV-2 entering the corneal donor pool with subsequent transmission might be perceived as theoretical. Face shields provide a sufficient barrier against splash and splatter contamination but may be insufficient against aerosols. Additional face masks would provide support against aerosols, but it remains debatable if corneal harvesting can be considered an aerosol-producing procedure. In the future we expect to see changes in current guidelines because of a surge in scientific activities to improve our understanding of the risks involved with cornea donation in the COVID-19 pandemic, and because current practice may reduce the availability of donor corneas due to new exclusion criteria while the demand remains unchanged.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , Corneal Transplantation , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Eye Banks/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Corneal Diseases/surgery , Eye Banks/standards , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Medical Countermeasures , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quarantine/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data , Tissue and Organ Harvesting , Tissue and Organ Procurement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL